Shah v. TalentBridge, Inc.

A C.D. California CIPA action publicly reported as dismissed for lack of Article III standing; a Ninth Circuit appeal docket followed.

What the public record supports

The public Ninth Circuit docket index identifies the appeal as Shah v. Talentbridge, Inc., No. 26-3514, arising from C.D. California No. 2:26-cv-00222-AH-SSCx. A public docket index lists a May 28, 2026 notice of appeal and later activity concerning costs.

Glaser Weil, counsel for TalentBridge, reports that the district court dismissed the action for lack of Article III standing and describes the dismissal as without leave to amend. That statement is counsel’s account of the result, not a substitute for the district-court order. This release therefore records the dismissal and the appeal separately.

What is not asserted here

This entry does not characterize the merits of every CIPA theory, predict the appeal, or label an asserted claim fraudulent, abusive, or extortionate. The reported ruling is a standing disposition in one case.

Source trail

Appellate docket index: Justia, Ninth Circuit No. 26-3514 — identifies the appeal and originating C.D. California matter.
Docket activity index: PACERMonitor, C.D. Cal. No. 2:26-cv-00222 — reports the notice of appeal and references the challenged orders.
Contemporaneous attorney reporting: Glaser Weil client alert — attributes its account of the standing dismissal to counsel who litigated the matter.